Tuesday, 29 January 2019

Does gender explain anything about mysticism and the expression of piety?


Does gender explain anything about mysticism and the expression of piety?


The explosion of mysticism in the late fourteenth and fifteen centuries shows us how mysticism could be utilised to empower an individual through investment in one’s religiosity. The fifteenth century is often tarnished as a period of reclamation by orthodox historiography. Indeed, Johnson titles his study of it, ‘the Age of Recovery’, in which it was a period devastated by pestilence and ceaseless warfare in Europe which ha lead to rapid social and economic destruction.[1] In the west the centralised bureaucratic royal governments were now able to “subject the nobility, control the clergy and create new fiscal administration”.[2] Which contrasted against the rigid three order ‘feudal age’ as historians such as Sidney Painter’s, The Rise of Feudal Monarchies depicts. Although there are problems with this notion, if one is to grant the traditional historiography as accurate; then the rise of mysticism and piety may be more a response of ‘class’ or social status than gender which had awakened an exposure to spirituality as the dissolution of three orders opened up spirituality beyond the clergy. However, mysticism is traditionally seen as feminine approach to spirituality by most historiography. Women saw mysticism as a means to liberate themselves through constructing an “autobiographical accounts of visionary experiences of Christ”; exploiting the process of the democratization of religion ongoing since the late thirteenth century to access a culture previously reserved to the liturgical life of monastic communities .[3] Therefore, it could be argued that ‘new mysticism’ through the democratization of religion was equally a useful means to empower oneself in an age which experienced the formation of an increasingly complex hierarchical social structure as a consequence of the decline of the feudal structure.

Gender roles are constructed throughout the bible, beginning in Genesis as soon as Eve was created from Adam’s rib and condemned for her seduction by the serpent with painful child birth and Adam sentenced to till the soil.[4] The gender roles conceptualise gender roles and prescribe separate expectations and thus piety of men and women. Piety was consumed through biblical and hagiographic representations though characterisations alongside moral narratives. Hagiography, more so than biblical scripture, presents a typology of saints to which holy women are almost exclusively Virgins and models of chastity as members of "that timorous and pious sex”.[5] What is significant is the growth in the later Middle Ages pan-European development of the cult of Mary which simultaneously expanded in conjunction with mysticism. In 431 the Council of Ephesus sanctioned the cult of Virgin as Mother of God, as Christ was revered for his passion which led to his eventual crucifixion, Mary became associated with compassion.[6] The softer female role of righteousness and good will can be consolidated through scripture. However, one must be careful to avoid a post-reformation teleological lens seeking a sola scriptura theological persuasion.  Swanton states that the “Instruction in the details of the faith was chiefly received from priests, either through a detailed syllabus of points which had to be covered, or through discussion of particular aspects via sermons.”[7] Rice argues that the laity looked to religious professionals as models of religious discipline that may eventually lead to perfection.[8] Suggesting that a post-pestilence society whose experience of death was incessant; people actively seeked piety which provides a market for mysticism.

Mysticism can be categorised into affective or speculative; which only be elusively defined depending on how the mystic engages with their experience philosophical. Historians such as Windeatt suggest that mysticism was more than a late medieval which helped endorse contemplative pious saints; but a production of literature contemplate life empowering the vernacular tongue to deliver God’s love and channel and strengthen  the reader’s faith.[9] Margery Kempe records her literal-minded visions in the vernacular, and published them to a wide intellectual  readership. Bell notes this as significant, and reflects the inferior social status of women whom were excluded from knowledge and the ‘the company of scholars; Bell recognises the production of vernacular religious texts as agents of a gradual and revolutionary cultural change.[10] In essence, it was such texts which allowed women to actively engage with the ‘company of scholars’ to which they could participate in the philosophical understanding of the world. As a women, Margery Kemp’s first visionary experience of Christ was during her first child birth; and other visions and mystical experiences were dictated, and published in the Book of Margery Kempe as she herself was not literate.[11] Her visons detail social construction’s and gender roles which allow one to socially examine societies perceptions of gender though spiritual experiences; and how through it how piety was constructed. Margery’s visions depict a forgiving Jesus reiterating the New Testament’s characteristics of God and provide the reader with a cause for hope in their own lives. Significantly, Jesus constituently refers to her as ‘Daughter;’ and commends her obedience and works of good works of charity and her penance, by weeping for her own sins as had Mary in anguish for Christ’s ‘bitter passion’. [12] What is significant is how Christ uses as a role model for Margery and medieval women, which perhaps reinforces the wider contextual popularity of the Virgin’s cult prior to the reformation.

As a man, Walter Hilton’s perspective on mysticism differs as one would expect, as of course it would be assumed he was able to interact with the ‘company of Scholars’.  Swanton argues one of his aims was to distinguish between an active and contemplative lives; in which an active life detracted from ones spiritual fulfilment in which a ‘contemplative’ life could achieve.[13]  This is significant as Hilton offers philosophical approach in which an individual relationship could be created and is worthy of more than appreciation; it is to be engaged with and understood and could be measured through ‘degrees of contemplation’. “The third degree of contemplation consists of both knowledge and love; in knowing God and the perfect love of Him.”[14] Such literature demonstrates the contemplation of societies concerns of how to invest in their spirituality, as indeed there was a demand for a physical approach from the readership.  Walter Hilton promotes such investment though exploring religiosity as a means to truly forge an individual relationship with God. Margery Kemp was able to fulfil this by pilgrimage and weekly communion. However, the hierarchical nature of degrees of contemplation perhaps tells us more about ‘class’ than they do gender. Through having the resources, money and most of all, time. Can one truly invest in their spirituality though acknowledging a hierarchical elevation of contemplation provides a platform to criticise the religiosity of others accordingly to a hierarchical descent of empowerment through spirituality. Indeed, one should emphasise with the theological perception of death; and how eternal life through the entity of purgatory in which one graduates to Heaven thus could maintain their power.  The term ‘class’ is used tentatively to describe a pre-industrialist era; class serves a Marxist sense to divide between the workers and the bourgeois while recognising an increasingly layered society in which ‘three orders’ is none applicable. Those whom held wealth, which could be transferred though a mercantile economic system present in the later middle ages. Thus wealth became more fluid and investable, and indeed one could more easily invest wealth, time and labour into a spiritual and mystical experiences. And indeed, pubications such as the Book of the Craft of Dying. This book suggest that a man who lives a pious life “in keeping with the commandments of God” may ascend to Heaven.[15] Significantly the book details “The Orisons and prayers that ought to be said upon the sick person in the article of death”.[16] In a helpless world, understood to be evil in character, prayer can be seen a form of empowerment, and by living a pious life, one can hope to expect eternal perdurable joy with the saints. And perhaps it would seem that mysticism and piety requires a level of investment limited to class not gender.

Richard Rolle is significant, as he too provides emotive mysticism often associated with an effeminate style of writing, as seen along with Margery Kempe’s as indeed emotive, and contrast to the hypothetical and pragmatic attitude of that of Hilton and to a lesser extent The Cloud author. Unlike Margery he writes in the vernacular, and his livelihood as a hermit is perhaps more comparable to Julian of Norwich. Watson accredits Rolles work as significant as it establishes  his own spiritual authority, and inspired other mystic works.[17] Like Margery Kempe who urges caution of the Holy Spirt, which is only apprehended when transformed into a dove.[18] Rolle uses fear to inspire doubt in one’s complacency to who expect salvation arguing “I have faith, I am baptized, I worship one God, I do not adore idols: how then can I be damned?”[19] Rolle questions the legitimacy f salvation without living a contemplative lifestyle and forging a truly individual relationship with God and conveys it directing it at the reader personally drawing on emotive themes.This genre of mysticism is often seen as effeminate, but actually it may be a product of his socio-economic status, in which the hermit lifestyle as an outsider of the ‘three orders’, Rolle’s back ground and mysticism produced may well be a product of society as much as women’s were. A lower social position on this earth prephaps inspired a need for spiritual fulfilment and thus power in which they do not  receive from mainstream society in which they interact.



Mysticism and personal experiences with Him are liberating. The author of The Cloud of Unknowing suggests poignantly “In the twinkling of an eye Heaven may be won or lost”.[20] This draws emphasis on the importance of visons which are believed to be intentional and divine in nature. The first half of the cloud questions the notion of the contemplative soul, in which the ‘unknowing cloud’ is separated from God by the ‘cloud of forgetting’ which attempts to suppress recollection and thought and wisdom of the cloud collected from scripture.[21]  One of the key themes of mystic literature is love. Hilton identifies the second degree of contemplation as “principally the act of love” devoted to Jesus, and can be taken to a ‘higher stage’ through remembrance of such love through spiritual acts like prayers and devotion through the rosary.[22] Significantly Swanton recognises the development of the Rosary as a fundamental spiritual exercise in which assisted spiritual focus.[23] The cloud reinforces the love of Jesus, “Love Jesus, and everything he has in yours. Because he is God, he is maker and giver of time. Because he is man, he has given true heed to time… Unite yourself to him by love and trust, and by that union you will be joined both to him”.[24] Clearly here, there is an explicit demand from the author that one obeys God and Man. This serves to reinforce patriarchy existent in society as it gives this sense that a man’s love is infinite, as is Jesus’. This contrasts with the love women can offer to who must model chastity and are valued for virginity. But it also suggests that the intimacy of God’s love is accessible and liberating though his manufactured experiences.



Overall, piety and mysticism provided a means for individuals to channel their religiosity and liberate themselves from domestic constraints of society. However, it is not surprising that such enthusiasm was driven through women. But one should note the social position of those women and ‘class’ as significant. And indeed, when we look at the cloud of unknowing, the absence of a gender and epicene nature of the writing allows one to extend beyond the gender binaries limits and explore other contributions particularly class. Indeed, women were able to channel spiritual fulfilment and energy which perhaps they could not attain from their own lives; but this was not attainable to just women, as men too engaged in this. Mysticism offered hope though the spiritual world to replace and distract from the secular frustrations, but also gain recognition though such ‘autobiographical accounts of visionary experiences’ with Christ; which a frustrated class were able to express their appreciation for Christ’s passion though mystic literature. In a world ravished by death, hunger and pestilence as older historiography suggests; one should not be surprised that such a class or people exploited the democratization of Christianity, which allowed them to absorb some power previously retained by the clergy. And the fourteenth centuries depleted stock of competent and highly trained clergy were unable to successfully oppose the challenge mystics presented.






Bibliography



Primary sources

C.Wolters,  The Cloud of unknowing and other works. (London: Penguin Books,1978).

M. Kempe, The Book of Margery Kempe, (London: Penguin Publications, 1985).

W. Hilton, [Translated by L. Sherley-Price], The ladder of perfection. (London: Penguin Books, 1957).

W.Caxton, H. Seuse, Comper, M.M, Frances, G. Congreve, The Book of theCraft of Dying, and other early English tracts concerning death. (London: Longmans, 1917).

R. Rolle, Judica Me in N. Watson. Richard Rolle and the Invention of Authority. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1991).





Secondary Sources:

B. Windeatt, English Mystics of the middle Ages, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).

B.Mcgin, 'The changing shape of late medieval mysticism'. Church History. Vol 65, Iss 2, p197-220.

J. Johnson. and W.Percy,. . The Age of Recovery. (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1970).

N. Rice. Lay piety and religious discipline in Middle English literature. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).

P. Brown. The Cult of Saints: The Rise and function of Saints in Latin Christianity. (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2009).

R. Carroll & Stephen Prickett, The Bible: Authorized King James Version, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).

R. N. Swanson, Catholic England: Faith, Religion and Observance before the Reformation, (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1993).

N. Watson. Richard Rolle and the Invention of Authority. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1991).

S. Bell. (1982). ‘Medieval Women Book Owners: Arbiters of Lay Piety and Ambassadors of Culture’. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, Vol 7 Iss 4,p p.742-768.

www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd_virg.htm (Accessed: 3/05/2016)







[1] J. Johnson. and W.Percy,. . The Age of Recovery. (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1970),pp1-15.
[2]  J. Johnson. and W.Percy,. . The Age of Recovery. (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1970),pp50-51
[3] B.Mcgin, 'The changing shape of late medieval mysticism'. Church History. Vol 65, Iss 2, p197-220.
[4] R. Carroll & Stephen Prickett, The Bible: Authorized King James Version, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997). Genesis 3,1-16
[5] P. Brown. The Cult of Saints: The Rise and function of Saints in Latin Christianity. (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2009). P28.
[7] R. N. Swanson, Catholic England: Faith, Religion and Observance before the Reformation, (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1993), p51.
[8] N. Rice. Lay piety and religious discipline in Middle English literature. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), pp1-3.
[9] B. Windeatt, English Mystics of the Middle Ages, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), p1.
[10] S. Bell. (1982). Medieval Women Book Owners: Arbiters of Lay Piety and Ambassadors of Culture. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 7(4), p.742-743.
[11] B. Windeatt, English Mystics of the Middle Ages, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994),  p227
[12] M. Kempe, The Book of Margery Kempe, (London: Penguin Publications, 1985), p198.
[13] R. N. Swanson, Catholic England: Faith, Religion and Observance before the Reformation, (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1993), p18.
[14] W. Hilton, [Translated by L. Sherley-Price], The ladder of perfection. (London: Penguin Books, 1957).  p11
[15] W.Caxton, H. Seuse, Comper, M.M, Frances, G. Congreve, The book of the craft of dying, and other early English tracts concerning death. (London: Longmans, 1917). p55
[16] W.Caxton, H. Seuse, Comper, M.M, Frances, G. Congreve, The book of the craft of dying, and other early English tracts concerning death. (London: Longmans, 1917). p79
[17] N. Watson. Richard Rolle and the Invention of Authority. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1991).
[18] M. Kempe, The Book of Margery Kempe, (London: Penguin Publications, 1985), p127.
[19] R. Rolle, Judica Me in N. Watson. Richard Rolle and the Invention of Authority. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1991).p78
[20] C. Wolters.  The Cloud of unknowing and other works. (London: Penguin Books,1978). p64
[21] B. Windeatt, English Mystics of the middle Ages, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), p68
[22] W. Hilton, [Translated by L. Sherley-Price], The ladder of perfection. (London: Penguin Books, 1957). p8
[23] R. N. Swanson, Catholic England: Faith, Religion and Observance before the Reformation, (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1993), p20
[24] C.Wolters.  The Cloud of unknowing and other works. (London: Penguin Books,1978). p64

Sunday, 14 October 2018

Hernando Cortez: A personal enquiry.


Hernando Cortez


Cortez is renowned for the successful conquest of the Aztec Empire; incredibly destroying the Aztec Empire which had taken centuries to build within two years and with less than six hundred men between 1518 and 1520. Indeed, a key figure in the glory of the Spanish Empire. Furthermore, Cortez’s conquests over modern day Mexico, Honduras and parts of Latin America helped facilitate the development social and political structure of New Spain and the administration of Tenochtitlan, and also demonstrating military techniques employed by conquistadors over territories to assert authority, and the legacy of the Spanish Empire in the world today. Certainly, the motives of such conquistadors and the long and short term impact had indeed found itself a focus of debate. Historians have compared such conquests to the Crusades of the High Middle Ages. Undeniably, the ‘Spiritual conquests’ of the New World peoples as Conquistadors such as Cortez facilitated conversion of native populations and were enthusiastic of the destruction of perceived heathen Mesoamerican culture to which was dismissed as satanic and evil. It could be argued it is the cultural, and not the economic legacy of conquistadors which is the most significant. However, one must also recognise other arguments such as the demographic and political implications the conquests of Spanish nobles into new and hostile territories to which they’re impact is also felt.

The military conquest of Aztec Empire, Cortez knew would require more than military might and advanced technology. Having so few troops was a major weakness of Conquistadors, despite having access to Calvary and gunpowder, the numbers of the Aztecs would overwhelm the conquistadors. Cortez was able to manipulate Native American groups; the Totonacs, Tlaxcaltecs and other subjugated Native American groups through political manoeuvring and physical force to secure alliances to advance on Tenochtitlan.[1] Indeed, this demonstrated Cortez’s diplomatic skills as a political strategist to secure victory. However, other historians such as Diaz have argued that the Aztecs lost because they were unfamiliar to mounted troops and techniques such as Calvary charges.[2] Of course the role of Calvary on a psychological level, as the impact of surprise as the unexpected charge and force could perhaps unleash a psychological terror amongst Aztec forces. However, historians such as McNeil discredit Cortez’s role as a political strategist and use of superior military techniques and argue that in fact a biological exchange was responsible for the collapse of the Aztec empire. McNeil argues Cortez’s conquest of the Aztecs and later Pizarro’s conquest of the Incas was founded on biological immunity to Old World diseases such as small pox, which were quickly able to wipe out large percentages of the population who possessed little or no imunity to Old World diseases the conquistadors carried such as Small Pox, which had a deep cultural and psychological effect, and an indicative auxiliary component which determined the success of Cortez’s conquest, and Spanish imperialism overall.[3]

The ruins of Tenochtitlan quickly became to centre of the Spanish Colonial life. Indeed, in Cortez’s third letter to Charles V in March 1521, Cortez writes, “Above all, they were fighting to increase and spread our Faith and submit to Your Majesty’s service all those lands and provinces which had rebelled; this should fill them with courage and desire to conquer and die.”[4] Despite Cortez declaring himself as a vassal for Charles V as sovereign, indeed the source suggests that rebellions have occurred. Restall argues that local autonomy eroded gradually under demographic and political pressures from non-native populations, and that the conquest was more gradual and could not be complete while the alteptl and ayllu existed.[5] Questions to the extent of the success of Cortez’s conquest of the Mexico and the extent to which strategies employed in the destruction of the Aztecs provided long term political stability for a flourishing colony to establish, or simply a means to allow further ruthless exploitation as previously practised on Caribbean colonies, to which Cortez was in fact infected with a disease that he told Emperor Montezuma II, “We Spaniards have a disease of the heart that only Gold can cure” [6].

Significantly in Cortez’s writings to the Spanish Crown, one of the main emphasises of the conquest is that of a spiritual conquest. The religion of the Aztecs centred on cosmic and natural forces and was polytheistic. Furthermore, the Aztecs pleased the gods by offering human sacrifice in order to secure rainfall, plentiful harvests and victory in battle. The beliefs in place offended the Spanish whom saw the practices as heathen and belittled them. The Spanish response, which became increasingly aggressive as the context of the reformation swept across Europe by the late 1520/30s, was one of a spiritual conversion. Indeed, Cortez wrote, “If these people were now to see the affairs of the Church and the service of God in the hands of canons or other dignitaries, and saw them indulge in the vices and profanities now common in Spain, knowing that such men were the ministers of God, it would bring our Faith into much harm that I believe any further preaching would be of no avail.”[7] Indeed, the spread of Christianity was seen as a just and moral obligation to which the bible and the papacy provided authority and justification for religious conversion. Indeed, the Papacy conferred the rights of the Spanish crown of patronage to the major ecclesiastical benefices of the new world in 1508.[8] Knight argues this is significant in developing a Spanish crusading zeal to which conquistadors saw themselves as active agents.[9] And indeed, Cortez was prevented from destroying Mexican religious idols by a friar. Indeed, Bernard Diaz writes of Cortez’s “customary exposition of our holy faith and in his injunctions [to the Indians] to give up sacrifice and sodomy”.[10] Indeed this demonstrates the extent to which religious motivation was perceived as important and necessary amongst conquistadors whom perhaps wished to seek piety to add to their glory and honour.

Other historians have taken an economic approach to imperialism. Knight argues that the conquest of Mexico was part of the gestation of European capitalism and served to integrate Mexico into the mercantile capitalist system[11]. Indeed, mercantilism defines the economic beliefs of early modern Europe which encouraged a small-country psychosis to expand in order to attain resources. Conquistadors such as Cortez’s motives to acquire resources for the realm of Spain as well as personal gains are indicative of the economic understanding of the time. Cortez was in the words of historian Jean Descola, “a young man [who] tried his luck”[12]. Indeed, lured by the myths of fortunes of the mainland of America. And it is a mercantilist capitalism which could be argued drives Cortez, seeking treasure and fortune, which is the ideological motivation and not religious piety.

Overall, Cortez and other Conquistadors are significant in the development of Spanish Empire, which covered most of central and South America, and lasted the longest. The cultural and demographic impacts are widely felt to the present day. Indeed, with the impact of diseases such as smallpox as McNeil strongly argues, but also the introduction Christianity. Conquistadors, and Cortez in Mexico as a case study show how the crown was able to rule over foreign lands, and introduce an economic policy which allowed Spain to safely extract resources and raw materials from the colonies by exploiting labour by manipulating the existing hierarchical native social structures allowing the conquistadors and the Crown of Spain to control. The aims of conquistadors pose historiographical debates as to their aims; secular or religious. While indeed, Gold and glory, (although mostly silver) lured conquistadors to the new world. One should not dismiss the sincere religious devotion and will of the conquistadors to Christian conversion. Indeed, the crusading spirit of Papal devotion seemly did sweep the new world as conquistadors such as Cortez and the Spanish Crown facilitated a movement towards cultural uniformity over their new American subjects. Indeed, it had been achieved by the inquisition following the Reconquista in the Iberian Peninsula which had driven out Moorish Muslims. Furthermore, however one must recognise secular interests of cultural uniformity in establishing allegiance to a monarch and the conquistador to establish authority and loyalty. But also in the context of the reformation in Northern Europe such devotion to the Papacy had diplomatic perks in securing papal backing of one’s government. It could be argued that the demographic impact of Small Pox as McNeil argued were significant, psychologically in converting natives, who’s God failed to protect them from disease to which the conquistadors’ God seemingly could. But early modern European societies’ devotion to its faith was absolute, and indeed Cortez’s religious devotion to covert the native population and eradicate the old religion was indeed a ‘crusading spirit’ to establish a sacred apostolic community, and indeed the continuation of Christianity and its devotion is one of the longest legacies of the Conquistadors in establishing law and order and facilitating the conversion of Christianity through cultural hybridisation. By transplanting religion and to some extent economic mercantilism and also Spanish law to Spanish colonies and this was achieved through Conquistadors such as Cortez integrating into an existing social structure. If they were able to achieve that, as Cortez did, personal glory and wealth were rewards but also the ability to spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ, the greatest and most honoured deed.

Words: 1549

Bibliography



Primary Sources



A.R, Pagden. Hernán Cortés, Letters from Mexico. (New York: Grossman Publishers, 1971).pp. 207- 333.



G. B, Tindall, & D. E, Shi. America: A Narrative History (Brief Ninth Edition), (New York: W.W.Norton & Company, 2013). p18.

Secondary Sources



J. Descola, The conquistadors. (London: Geroge Allen & Unwin Ltd, 1954). Pp129- 140.



B. Diaz.The Conquest of New Spain. (London: Penguin Books, 1963).pp189- 216.



J.H, Elliott, Imperial Spain, (London: Penguin Books, 2002).  pp53-54



Knight, Mexico: From the Beginning to the Spanish Conquest. (Cambridge: Cambridge University

Press, 2002).  194- 210.



W. H, McNeill. Plagues and Peoples. (London: Penguin Books, 1979). p170



M. Restall.  Severn Myths of the Spanish Conquest. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003). p74.



M, Robinson III, The Spanish Invasion of Mexico 1519–1521. (USA: Ofsprey, 2014), p35.







[1] The Spanish Invasion of Mexico 1519–1521. p35.
[2] B. Diaz. The Conquest of New Spain, (London: Penguin Books, 1963). p189-216.
[3] W. H, McNeill. Plagues and Peoples. (London: Penguin Books, 1979). p170.
[4]  A.R, Pagden. Hernán Cortés, Letters from Mexico. (New York: Grossman Publishers, 1971). p207
[5] M. Restall.  Severn Myths of the Spanish Conquest. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003). p74.
[6] G. B, Tindall, & D. E, Shi. America: A Narrative History (Brief Ninth Edition), (New York: W.W.Norton & Company, 2013). p18
[7] A.R, Pagden. Hernán Cortés, Letters from Mexico. (New York: Grossman Publishers, 1971). p333
[8] Knight, Mexico: From the Beginning to the Spanish Conquest. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002). p 209.
[9] Knight, Mexico: From the Beginning to the Spanish Conquest. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).   p210
[10] J.H, Elliott, Imperial Spain, (London: Penguin Books, 2002).  pp53-54
[11] Knight, Mexico: From the Beginning to the Spanish Conquest. (Cambridge: Cambrodge University Press, 2002).  p194
[12] J. Descola, The conquistadors. (London: Geroge Allen & Unwin Ltd, 1954). P129

Assessing the significance of St Luke in the Middle Ages




Assessing the significance of St Luke in the Middle Ages


(Please note that the King James Bible has been used to interpret religious doctrine in this article, but should be noted that this source was translated in 1611 and contemporary scriptures used by the clergy were in Latin).


The cults of Saint Luke the evangelist and Archangel Michael are significant as examples of interpreting the perceived instrumental power and influential power of saints in the middle ages at different levels of medieval society.  Saints are fundamental in leading an apostolic lifestyle, indeed, “For thou art an holy people unto the lord thy God: the Lord thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are on the face of the earth”. (Deuteronomy 7:6, KJV).[1] Furthermore, Rosenwein argues they provided a model of virtue and performed miraculous works as intercessors on God’s behalf.[2]  Archangel Michael status is founded in his biblical role particularly in Revelations, often depicted as a commander holding a spear, which was used to fight Satan. Conversely Saint Luke is venerated for his authorship of biblical scripture such as ‘The Gospel According to Luke and the ‘Acts of the Apostles,’ the gospel of Luke and Acts make up a two-volume work which scholars call Luke-Acts, jointly accounting  for 27.5% of the New Testament.[3] Both are clear examples of imperative understood virtuous icons of glory venerated throughout the Middle Ages.

 Saints have a significant role in society which included both the living and the dead, as they themselves were “the very special dead”. [4] As a special friend of God and Jesus Christ, Saints had influential and an influential power on a social and political level. The Golden Legend provides a thirteenth century view of the saints. Demonstrating how medieval society marvelled at the perceived strength, wonder and courage of Archangel Michael leading a battalion of angels against Satan. Furthermore, the source also references the hierarchal structure of angels, and how Archangel Michael as an archangel, would be found in the third of the three orders, the Hypophany.[5] Thus demonstrated how hierarchical structures imperative to medieval society and transcended into Christian doctrine and beliefs. Indeed, the Litany of the Saints, show a hierarchy of the saints, to which they were ordered in their relationship to Jesus Christ with Saint Mary as most significant as the mother of God, followed by the angels, prophets, disciples, martyrs, clergy through to the laity.[6] It demonstrates rigid categorization and understands different groups to be more significant than others, indicative of contemporary taste. Therefore,  saint were able to exercise divine power at different levels, making veneration of a particular saint more useful than another, and expected to respond appropriately to the Individuals demands through prayer.

While intercession provides man saints an opportunity to receive veneration, others such as Saint Luke offer alternative methods of communion with Jesus Christ, through authorship of biblical scripture, indeed Luke produced both The Gospel of Luke and Acts of the Apostles. In which Luke was able to provide a testimony of Jesus Christ’s miracles. Luke’s gospel is distinguished for the human attributes given to Jesus. Applauded as the compassionate saviour which Luke expresses Jesus’s undisputed love for all people, reaching out for women, the poor and outcasts in society. This particular emphasis was appealing to a clerical audience due to Jesus’s humanist actions. Furthermore, The Golden Legend recognises Luke’s symbolism through a sacrificial calf because he indulges Christ’s priesthood.[7] It is also important to recognise Luke’s Gospels significance to clergy as both its humanist depiction of Christ, but also the gospel’s anti-Maronite doctrine. Indeed, contemporary fears persisted to which Marcionism could threaten a schism within the Church through to middle ages.[8] This demonstrates how the saint’s attributes prescribed to a particular demographic for veneration, but how saints could be useful to support a particular cause on the wider geo-political sphere.

Saint Michael as an archangel takes an unusual position as, arguably, the most purist and pious genre of saints due to the nature of its sanctity formed in heaven as intercessors on heaven and earth, its significants is perceived to be inimitable through its typology. “Are they not all ministering spirits, sent forth to minister for them who shall be heirs of salvation?” (Hebrews 1: 14, KJV).[9] Indeed, contemporary’s perceived angels to act as spiritual messengers of God in order to guide and protect God’s people and could continue to act as  intercessors in the middle ages as they had done in biblical times.  The absence of a psychical body, or attainable relics left the saint’s cult universally deployable and adaptable to multiple localities. Indeed, Johnson supports that the cult of Saint Michael was the largest in the British Isles after Saint Peter, enjoying its greatest popularity in the Anglo-Norman period.[10] The cult of Saint Michael can certainly be described as universal, which Johnson argues three major Michealine cultic centres; Constantine’s Empire, the Lombards and the Carolingians, appropriated Saint Michael as the commander of the heavenly host in battle, as the patron saint of imperial ambition, to which such legionary appreciations determined characteristics of the archangel through earthly appreciations.[11] Demonstrating how the saint’s cult can extend into legend to which they are venerated as an iconic. Thirteenth century literature such as Gilte Legende,  Saint Michael is praised for his attack against Lucifer and the text encourages people to “make hym her special patron” to be worshiped will “deliuer us, refreyning, in the Apocalips”.[12] This demonstrates the extent to which legend played an important part in how the saint’s cult was perceived as significant through extra-canonical, often legends demonstrate how saints were understood, often inundated by theological misconceptions, which determine the saint’s perceived instrumentality.

During the crusades Saint Luke experienced a sanctified inventio, and was moved from Constantinople to Padua in Italy.  Luke is depicted as with pen in his hand, near an ox, symbolic of Christ’s sacrifice. His body, lied in Abbey of Santa Giustina, and provided a pilgrimage site, demonstrating how Luke’s cult had been translated to Italy and extended to western Christendom. Thus providing physical relics for devotion which could be disseminated and act as a vector for miraculous functions. Geary argues the significance of relics as a symbolic value to when illiterate society could appreciate with substantial local irregularity in veneration; as it was impossible to steal a relics old function in its original locality, of new appreciation for a saint had to come from “extraneous symbols induced along with the relics”.[13] Indeed, the devotion to a particular saint so some extent depended on the understood religiosity of audience’s perception of the saint’s power attained through cultic devotion. The extent to which saint’s experience of furta sacra was seemingly widespread in response to post-Carolingian Europe which needed to look to local saints for authority and order as competing nobilities feuded against one another and weakened political and cultural horizons. Geary argues this provided the conditions to allow a pan-European phenomena of  saint’s cults throughout western Christendom, facilitated by papal insistence on Saint Peter’s successor’s dignity,  and the increasing prominence of the ‘cult of Christ’ celebrated through the Eucharist; which was further expanded in the eleventh and twelfth centuries through expansion of commercial activities.[14] The translation of saint’s from east to west is indicative of a cultural shift of Christian authority from east to west, which a saint’s cult expanded through access to relics which provided Western Christendom with a saint’s attributes they could model their worship.

Thus it would seem devotion to saint could be rejected without a relic or to which a shrine could deploy the cult. However, Saint Michael’s locality remains in heaven which thus gives Michael the opportunity to become a universal by not being limited to a locality to which his relics must be acquired. Johnson argues that the archangel’s ‘asomatic limitations’ restricted Archangels to possess a hagiographic dossier resting on graphic descriptions of saints founded on legends.[15] However, some material relics were veneration, indeed Mont Saint Michael in Normandy claimed to possess Saint Michael’s sword and shield, and this demonstrates how a saint’s narrative could be manipulated, possibly to legitimize the monastic site as a pilgrimage center, central to economic motivation.

Overall, hierarchy is central to the saints, as was necessary to apply hierarchical relations to the divine as conceivable to society which depended upon hierarchal relations through tight social orders in order to recreate a power structure of the celestial which could then transfer their perceived power though intercession on earth. The attraction of a particular devotion to a saint can be seen through the imitability and inimitability of a saint which often correlates to the power of a saint and the charisma of the saint generated through their legend. Relics can then be used as physical entities as instruments of veneration in exchange for divine intercession. Saints acted as both pious models of Christian virtue and powerful intercessors ordained to perform miracles and understood to be active. Saints demonstrate how medieval society saw itself, to which aspired and it modelled itself. Saint’s interact within a power structure to which power was understood to disseminate from an omnipotent and omnipresent God, to which Saints acted within a co-ordinated system of hierarchy and obedience to which mirrored society in western Christendom. Saints provided intercession for their veneration as well as a module of virtue like Christ. They play a small part in the wider cult of Christianity. They demonstrate how individual virtuous choices, to which medieval society can imitate respected methods demonstrated through the typology such as virginity, confession, evangelism or Martyrdom. Qualities appreciated by a waring society that understood chivalry and faith to be aspirational. Therefore saints stood as contrary of the Devil who anticipates sinfulness of humanity, which is understood to be as much preordained in real life as in biblical scripture, ever since Eve picked the apple from the tree of knowledge in genesis.

Therefore, it is the prevalence of sin within medieval society presences saints as idealistic, whom lived a sinless life, avoided purgatory, and immediately join Jesus in heaven as a special friend of God.  This understanding of a saint therefore made veneration of one important as they could assist an individual on earth to perform a miracles in order to pass the gates of heaven. A society which established the saint’s power in the divine therefore automatically had established the saint’s power on earth. This allowed them to become social and political instruments in a society which believed earthy relics could enhance the closeness between saints; which in turn brought them closer to Jesus as a ‘mutual friend’. The closeness of the saint to Jesus, determined his power in both heaven and earth. With the prospect of those who venerated expecting successful and frequent intercession and expecting to increase their prospects of reducing their time in purgatory. Saint Michael, as an archangel, his power is not contested and we see his understood power on the hierarchy through the Liturgy of Saints as testimony to his perceived power, in comparison to Saint Luke. Therefore Archangel Michael’ veneration is experienced in through understanding his closeness to God as a heavenly divine creation. Therefore it is not surprising that physical relics of the Archangel have been found in Mont Saint Michael for example even though they theologically cannot exist on earth; to provide useful tools in harnessing the Saints power for political and personal needs. This supports the notion that powerful saint’s veneration and cult was in response to a violent post Carolingian world which power and authority were less certain, intrinsic to a society which relied on power relations.

Word Count: 1928.






Bibliography



Primary Sources



Books:

R. Carroll & Stephen Prickett, The Bible: Authorized King James Version, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).



W. G, Ryan (Translator), Jacobus de Voragine, The Golden Legend, (Princeton, New Jersey, 1993).



R. Hamer, Gilte Legende, (Oxford: Oxford University Press and Society, 2012).



Websites:

W. Fitzgerald & O. Praem. The Litany of Saints in the Liturgy, http://www.adoremus.org/1108LitanyofSaints.html, (accessed 30 November 2015).



Secondary Sources



Books:



B. H. Rosenwein, 3rd Ed, A Short History of the Middle Ages, (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2009). p31.



E. M, Boring. An Introduction to the New Testament: History, Literature, Theology. (Westminster: John Knox Press, 2012).



S. Ozment, Age of Reform, 1250-1500, (USA: Yale University Press, 1980).



R. F, Johnson. Saint Michael The Archangel In Medieval English Legend.( Woodbridge:  Boydell Press, 2005).



J. Adair, The Pilgrims’ Way: Shrines and Saints in Britain and Ireland, (Hamshire: Thames and Hudon, 1978).

P. Brown. The Cult of Saints, (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1981).

P. J, Geary, Furta Sacra. (New Jersey: Princeton University Press).

S. Farmer & B. H. Rosenwein. Monks and Nuns, Saints and Outcasts, Religion in Medieval Society: Essays in Honor of Lester K. Little. (USA: Cornell University Press, 2000).

J. H. Lynch & P. C. Adams, 2nd Ed, The Medieval Church: A brief history. (Abingdon: Routledge, 2014).

G. Tellenbach, The Church in Western Europe from the Tenth to the early Twelfth Century, (Cambridge: Cambridge Univerity Press, 1993).







[1] R. Carroll & Stephen Prickett, The Bible: Authorized King James Version, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997). Deuteronomy 7:6.
[2] B. H. Rosenwin, 3rd Ed, A Short History of the Middle Ages, (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2009). p31.
[3] E. M, Boring. An Introduction to the New Testament: History, Literature, Theology. (Westminster: John Knox Press, 2012). p556.
[4] P. Brown. The Cult of Saints: The Rise and function of Saints in Latin Christianity. (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2009). p69.
[5] W. G, Ryan (Translator), Jacobus de Voragine, The golden Legend, (Princeton, New Jersey, 1993). pp201-211.
[6] W. Fitzgerald & O. Praem. The Litany of Saints in the Liturgy, http://www.adoremus.org/1108LitanyofSaints.html, (accessed 30 November 2015).
[7] W. G, Ryan (Translator), Jacobus de Voragine, The golden Legend, (Princeton, New Jersey, 1993). p248.
[8] S. Ozment, Age of Reform, 1250-1500, (USA: Yale University Press, 1980). P65.
[9] R. Carroll & Stephen Prickett, The Bible: Authorized King James Version, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).  Hebrews 1: 14.
[10] R. F, Johnson. Saint Michael The Archangel In Medieval English Legend.( Woodbridge:  Boydell Press, 2005). p32.
[11]R. F, Johnson. Saint Michael The Archangel In Medieval English Legend.( Woodbridge:  Boydell Press, 2005). p106.
[12] R. Hamer, Gilte Legende, (Oxford: Oxford University Press and Society, 2012). pp368-371.
[13] P. J, Geary, Furta Sacra. (New Jersey: Princeton University Press).P 7
[14] P. J, Geary, Furta Sacra. (New Jersey: Princeton University Press). p24-25.
[15] R. F, Johnson. Saint Michael The Archangel In Medieval English Legend.( Woodbridge:  Boydell Press, 2005). p4.

Does gender explain anything about mysticism and the expression of piety?

Does gender explain anything about mysticism and the expression of piety? The explosion of mysticism in the late fourteenth and fif...